CBSE’s Competency Revolution: A Turning Point—or a New Layer of Inequality?
The Central Board of Secondary Education’s decision to redesign board examinations by making 50% of questions competency-based from 2026 marks one of the most consequential shifts in Indian schooling in decades.
On paper,
it signals a long-overdue departure from rote memorisation toward analysis,
application, and reasoning, aligning with the National Education Policy
(NEP) 2020. In spirit, it promises liberation—from predictable question
patterns, guidebooks, and memory-driven success.
In
practice, however, the reform also tests a harder truth: India’s schooling
system is deeply unequal.
If implemented thoughtfully, this change could redefine learning. If
mishandled, it risks widening the rural–urban divide and intensifying academic
inequality.
Reactions
across the country reflect this tension—ranging from celebration to quiet
panic.
Why This
Reform Matters
For
decades, Indian education functioned like a memory competition. Students were
trained to:
- Memorise textbook lines
- Predict “important
questions”
- Optimise marks, not
understanding
Schools
proudly announced high pass percentages even as classrooms discouraged
questioning.
Competency-based
questions—case
studies, situational problems, analytical prompts—aim to disrupt this culture.
They demand that students:
- Interpret information
- Apply concepts to unfamiliar
contexts
- Compare, evaluate, and
reason
For
students who understand concepts but struggle with flawless memorisation, this
shift is potentially transformative. The quiet thinker at the back of the
class—long overshadowed by professional crammers—may finally find space to
succeed.
At the
same time, old certainties crumble. Revision notes alone will no longer
guarantee marks. Predictable patterns disappear. And the famous parental
assurance—“Aunty’s son said this will definitely come”—loses its power.
The
Rural–Urban Divide: Where the Reform Meets Reality
Here lies
the reform’s greatest risk.
Urban Advantage
Students
in urban private schools often already experience:
- Trained teachers
- Digital tools and labs
- Discussion-based classrooms
- Exposure to Olympiads and
problem-solving
For them,
competency-based assessment is an evolution, not a shock.
Rural Reality
In
contrast, many rural and government schools operate under severe constraints:
- Overcrowded classrooms
- Limited resources
- Teacher shortages
- Minimal training in
analytical pedagogy
Many
students are first-generation learners without academic support at home.
Asking them to solve application-based problems without prior exposure risks
turning reform into exclusion.
Teachers,
too, face challenges—not of intent, but of preparation. Teaching application
requires time, materials, and conceptual freedom. Where schools lack libraries,
labs, or even stable electricity, policy ambition can hover far above classroom
reality.
Coaching
Centres and the New Pressure Economy
Competency-based
exams also disrupt the traditional coaching ecosystem built around solved
papers
and pattern prediction.
While
coaching centres will adapt—rebranding themselves as hubs for “analytical
training”—the risk is familiar:
increased dependence on paid support, especially among families anxious
to keep up.
Without
parallel investment in government schools, reform may unintentionally push
disadvantaged students further into inequality rather than freeing them from
it.
Teachers:
The Backbone—and the Battlefield
No
educational reform succeeds without teachers.
Competency-based
learning requires educators who can:
- Design meaningful activities
- Encourage questioning
- Evaluate open-ended
responses fairly
Yet
professional development remains uneven across regions. Without structured training
and clear assessment rubrics, teachers may struggle—leading to inconsistency,
subjectivity, and confusion.
Redesigning
exams without equipping teachers is like installing a new engine without
teaching the driver how to steer.
A Reform
Full of Promise—But Demanding Courage
CBSE
deserves credit for ambition. India cannot afford an education system that
rewards memory over understanding. The global economy does not hire memorisers;
artificial intelligence already outperforms them.
If
implemented responsibly, this reform could:
- Reduce exam fear
- Encourage real understanding
- Promote creativity and
problem-solving
- Bridge the
education–employment gap
But
execution is everything.
Reform
must travel beyond circulars and presentations. It must reach classrooms,
teachers, and students through sustained investment—not expectation.
Without
that, the system risks producing a familiar outcome:
urban students writing analytical essays while rural students face questions
they were never trained to answer.
Obituary
to Rote Learning
A
satirical tribute to a dearly departed era
To
capture the cultural shift this reform represents, here is a brief obituary to
the system it seeks to replace.
Rote
Learning—also known as Rattafication, Cramming, and Memory Without
Meaning—passed away quietly after decades of dominance, following the
announcement that 50% of CBSE board exams will now be competency-based.
It is
survived by:
- Guidebooks with 10-year
solved papers
- Dictated notes without
explanation
- Question predictions based
on planetary alignment
- The timeless advice: “Just
memorise—understanding is optional.”
Rote
Learning produced generations who could define democracy perfectly yet
struggled to recognise it in practice. It helped students score 99% in physics
while remaining unsure how a light bulb works.
Its
influence waned when teachers began asking a terrifying question:
“But what do you understand?”
Reports
suggest it died instantly.
Beyond
Satire: What Policymakers Must Do Next
Replacing
rote learning is not symbolic—it is structural.
1. Strengthen Teacher Training
- Mandatory annual training in
conceptual teaching and assessment
- Clear rubrics for evaluating
analytical answers
- Incentives for skilled
teachers to serve in rural schools
- Libraries, labs, digital
tools in government schools
- Regional resource hubs
- Learning material in local
languages and contexts
3. Redesign Curriculum, Not Just Exams
- Reduce syllabus overload
- Introduce case studies and
interdisciplinary learning
- Provide sample
competency-based answer frameworks
4. Reform Assessment Holistically
- Emphasise formative and
project-based evaluation
- Reduce one-day,
high-pressure dependency
- Track progress over time
5. Protect First-Generation Learners
- Bridge courses and mentoring
- Community learning support
- NGO and volunteer
partnerships
6. Regulate the Coaching Industry
- Prevent exploitative
marketing
- Encourage collaboration with
schools
- Promote affordable and open
learning resources
Final
Reflection
The
decision to make 50% of board exam questions competency-based is bold,
necessary, and overdue.
But
revolutions require more than announcements. They demand infrastructure,
training, and empathy.
If done
well, this reform could nurture a generation of thoughtful, confident,
inventive Indians.
If not, it risks producing a new abundance of something else entirely:
competency-based
confusion.
As NCERT
textbooks wait quietly, one can almost hear them whisper:
“Maybe now they’ll actually read us.”
Five Years of NEP 2020: What Changed in Classrooms—and What Stayed on
Paper.
https://explainitclearly.blogspot.com/2025/12/five-years-of-nep-2020-implementation-reality.html
CUET and
the Centralisation of College Admissions: Who Really Wins?
https://explainitclearly.blogspot.com/2025/12/cuet-centralised-college-admissions-inequality.html
The
Aravallis - Supreme Court’s recent judgement and the intense debate.
https://explainitclearly.blogspot.com/2025/12/the-aravallis-supreme-courts-recent.html
What Is
ExplainIt Clearly? And Why This Blog Exists?
https://explainitclearly.blogspot.com/2025/12/what-is-explainit-clearly-and-why-this.html
Manish Kumar is an independent education and career writer who focuses on simplifying complex academic, policy, and career-related topics for Indian students.
Through Explain It Clearly, he explores career decision-making, education reform, entrance exams, and emerging opportunities beyond conventional paths—helping students and parents make informed, pressure-free decisions grounded in long-term thinking.
Comments
Post a Comment